4.5 Article

Floating treatment wetlands as biological buoyant filters for wastewater reclamation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
卷 21, 期 13, 页码 1273-1289

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2019.1633253

关键词

Effluent; floating treatment wetlands; plant-microbe interaction; phytoremediation; wastewater treatment; water pollution

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission, Pakistan [1-52/ILS-UITSP/HEC/2014, 20-3854/R7D/HEC/14]
  2. International Foundation of Science (IFS) Sweden
  3. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) [W/5104-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) are an innovative product of ecological engineering that can play a promising role in wastewater treatment. It provides low-cost, eco-friendly, and sustainable solutions for the treatment of wastewater, particularly in regions with economic constraints. Generally, FTWs comprise rooted plants that grow on the surface of water with their roots extending down into the pelagic zone rather than being embedded into the sediments. This drooping structure helps develop (1) a hydraulic flow between the root network and the bottom of the treatment system and (2) a large biologically active surface area for the physical entrapment (filtration) of contaminants, as well as their biochemical transformation and degradation. Furthermore, the rooted network allows proliferation of microorganisms that form biofilms and enhance pollutant degradation while promoting plant growth. The augmentation of bacteria in FTWs has been proven to be the most effective approach for reclamation of wastewater. This article discusses the operational parameters of FTWs for maximal remediation of wastewater and highlights the importance of plant-bacteria partnerships in a typical FTW system for enhanced cleanup of wastewater. We propose that this technology is preferable over other methods that require high energy, costs, and area to install or operate machinery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据