4.7 Article

Fabrication of cell membrane-adhesive soft polymeric nanovehicles for noninvasive visualization of epidermal-dermal junction-targeted drug delivery

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 565, 期 -, 页码 233-241

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.05.014

关键词

Transdermal delivery; Polymeric nanovehicles; Cell membrane adhesiveness; Noninvasive visualization

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2016R1A2B2016148, 2018M3A9G2057170]
  2. Materials and Components Technology Development Program of MOTIE/KEIT [10077704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a polymeric nanovehicles (PNVs)-based enhanced transdermal delivery platform. A technical advance can be found in that delivery efficiency is significantly enhanced by effective adhesion of PNVs to the cell membrane, which is characterized noninvasively by using a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)-based skin visualization technique. To this end, the PNVs with a soft core phase were fabricated through co-assembly of two amphiphilic triblock copolymers, poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEOb-PCL-b-PEO) and poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(propylene oxide)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO). The softness of PNVs was tuned successfully, while maintaining the particle size at similar to 110 nm, by incorporation of PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO into the PNVs to a volume fraction of 0.3. Through an ex vivo skin penetration test, we showed that transactivating transcriptional activator (TAT)-decorated soft PNVs could not only exert strong adhesion to skin but also increase cellular uptake, leading to a transdermal delivery efficiency that is twice that of a hard PNV control. Moreover, CLSM-based noninvasive visualization of a fluorescent drug probe in the skin showed that the adhesiveness and softness of the PNVs contributed directly to the enhancement of transdermal delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据