4.7 Article

Theoretical prediction and crashworthiness optimization of thin-walled structures with single-box multi-cell section under three-point bending loading

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 703-714

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.013

关键词

TWS-SMC; Three-point bending loading; Energy absorption mechanism; Theoretical prediction; Crashworthiness optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51805221]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M640460]
  3. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Fund [2018K018C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to study the bending collapse behavior and energy absorption mechanism of thin-walled structures with single-box multi-cell section (TWS-SMC). A theoretical prediction model of TWS-SMC is developed under three-point bending loading. The theoretical prediction formulas are also derived by dividing the TWS-SMC into web parts and flange parts. The accuracy and generality of the theoretical prediction formulas are validated by performing three-point bending test and finite element analysis (FEA). To further validate the theoretical prediction formulas and improve the energy-absorption capacity, both theoretical prediction formulas and FEA based surrogate models are employed to perform the crashworthiness optimization of the TWS-SMC. The results show that (i) the Pareto frontiers obtained from the theoretical prediction formulas show an excellent coincidence with those from the FEA based surrogate models, which means that the theoretical prediction formulas can be directly used to crashworthiness optimization design for the sake of computational efficiency; (ii) the energy-absorption capacity of TWS-SMC is superior to thin-walled structures with single-box one-cell section (TWS-S1C) under the same weight, and its energy-absorption capacity will improve gradually with the number of web parts increased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据