4.7 Article

Surveillance of adverse events in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: A global feasibility study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.03.036

关键词

Tuberculosis; MDR-TB; Adverse events; Monitoring; Delamanid; Bedaquiline

资金

  1. Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN
  2. Committee on TB Treatment)
  3. Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN
  4. Committee on Clinical trials)
  5. Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN
  6. Committee on Global TB Consilium)
  7. European Respiratory Society Latin American project
  8. ALAT (Asociacion Latino Americana de Torax - Latino American Thoracic Association)
  9. SBPT (Brazilian Society of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The World Health Organization launched a global initiative, known as aDSM (active TB drug safety monitoring and management) to better describe the safety profile of new treatment regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in real-world settings. However, comprehensive surveillance is difficult to implement in several countries. The aim of the aDSM project is to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing national aDSM registers and to describe the type and the frequency of adverse events (AEs) associated with exposure to the new anti-TB drugs. Following a pilot study carried out in 2016, official involvement of TB reference centres/countries into the project was sought and cases treated with bedaquiline- and/or delamanid-containing regimens were consecutively recruited. AEs were prospectively collected ensuring potential attribution of the AE to a specific drug based on its known safety profile. A total of 309 cases were fully reported from 41 centres in 27 countries (65% males; 268 treated with bedaquiline, 20 with delamanid, and 21 with both drugs) out of an estimated 781 cases the participating countries had committed to report by the first quarter of 2019. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据