4.7 Article

Metal sulfide-based process analysis for hydrogen generation from hydrogen sulfide conversion

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 39, 页码 21336-21350

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.180

关键词

Sulfur recovery; Iron sulfide-based chemical looping; H-2 production; Exergy analysis; Energy analysis; Staged H-2 separation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fossil fuel power plants often generate sulfur species such as hydrogen sulfide or sulfur dioxide due to the sulfur content of the raw feedstocks. To combat the associated environmental, processing, and corrosion issues, facilities commonly utilize a Claus process to convert hydrogen sulfide (H2S) to elemental sulfur. Unfortunately, the potential for H-2 production from H2S is lost in the Claus process. In this study, two chemical looping process configurations utilizing metal sulfides as chemical intermediates for sulfur recovery are investigated: (1) sulfur recovery (SR) system for sulfur production; (2) sulfur and hydrogen (H-2) recovery (SHR) system for sulfur and H-2 and production utilizing staged H-2 separation. Since, H-2 yield and sulfur recovery in a single thermal decomposition reactor is limited by low H2S equilibrium conversion, a staged H-2 separation approach is used to increase H2S conversion to H-2 using the SHR system. Steady-state simulations and optimization of process conditions are conducted in Aspen Plus (v10) simulation software for the chemical looping process configurations and the Claus process. An energy and exergy analysis are done for the Claus and chemical looping processes to demonstrate the relative contribution to exergy destruction from different unit operations as well as overall exergy and energy efficiency. The two chemical looping process configurations are compared against the conventional Claus process for similar sulfur recovery in a 629 MWe integrated gasification combined cycle power plant. The SHR system is found to be the most efficient option due to a 97.11% exergy efficiency with 99.31% H-2 recovery. The overall energy and exergy efficiencies of this chemical looping system are 14.74% and 21.54% points higher than the Claus process, respectively, suggesting more efficient use of total input energy. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据