4.7 Article

A skeletal mechanism for prediction of ignition delay times and laminar premixed flame velocities of hydrogen-methane mixtures under gas turbine conditions

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 33, 页码 18573-18585

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.068

关键词

Chemical kinetics; H-2-CH4 combustion; Flame speed; Ignition delay; Reduced mechanisms

资金

  1. UNINETT Sigma2 [nn9527k]
  2. NCCS Centre
  3. Research Council of Norway [257579/E20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to eliminate unimportant steps from a detailed chemical-kinetic mechanism in order to identify a skeletal kinetic mechanism that can predict with sufficient accuracy ignition delay times and laminar premixed-flame velocities for H-2-CH4 mixtures under conditions of practical interest in gas-turbine applications, which pertain to high pressure, high reactant temperature, and primarily lean-to-stoichiometric mixture compositions (although somewhat rich conditions also are considered for completeness). The accuracy of selected detailed chemical-kinetic mechanisms that are suited to represent combustion of hydrogen-methane mixtures in air was evaluated through comparison of computed and measured ignition delay times and laminar flame velocities, and because of its relative simplicity and sufficient accuracy, the San Diego mechanism was selected for the needed chemical-kinetic reduction. Under the pressure and temperature conditions of the mixture composition addressed, thirty nine reversible elementary steps involving eighteen species were found to suffice to describe with acceptable accuracy both the ignition delay time and the laminar burning velocities. The skeletal mechanism is given here, along with discussion of its derivation and characteristics, as well as comparison of its predictions with those of the detailed mechanism and, where possible, with experiment. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据