4.3 Article

Removal of a reactive dye using NaOH-activated biochar prepared from peanut shell by pyrolysis process

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19392699.2019.1644326

关键词

Peanut shell; pyrolysis; biochar; remazol orange; removal; single-stage batch adsorber design

资金

  1. Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [107Y043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on using activated biochar produced from peanut shell wastes to remove the reactive dye RO-RGB from aqueous solution. It was found that the adsorption capacity increased with higher initial dye concentration and temperature, while decreasing with higher pH.
Firstly, biochar was produced using peanut shell wastes at 500 degrees C under inert gas nitrogen by pyrolysis. Then, the biochar was activated with NaOH. Activated biochar produced was characterized by SEM, FTIR, elemental analysis and N-2 adsorption. The activated biochar obtained was utilized as an adsorbent for the removal of remazol orange RGB (RO-RGB), a reactive dye, from aqueous solution by adsorption method. The effects of initial dye concentration (20, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mg L-1), solution temperature (20 degrees C, 30 degrees C, 40 degrees C, and 50 degrees C) and pH (3, 5, 7 and 9) on the adsorption were investigated at different contact times. The amounts of the dye adsorbed increased with increasing initial dye concentration and temperature while it was decreasing with increasing pH. The most percent adsorption was found as 94.49% under conditions studied. Adsorption followed the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models as well as the pseudo-second order kinetic model. A favorable adsorption was observed by means of a dimensionless equilibrium factor, an essential characteristic of the Langmuir isotherm. From the results of single-stage batch adsorption, the required biochar mass for 90% dye removal in 10 L dye solution was estimated as 124.61 g. Thermodynamic data indicated a spontaneous and endothermic adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据