4.7 Article

Chitosan microparticle-based immunoaffinity chromatography supports prepared by membrane emulsification technique: Characterization and application

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.064

关键词

Chitosan micropartides; Zearalenone; Immunoaffinity chromatography

资金

  1. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015BAK45B00]
  2. Zhenjiang Sci-Tech Plan [NY2017012]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, chitosan microparticles intended to be used as matrix support for immunoaffinity chromatography were prepared by membrane emulsification technique. Regular spherical chitosan microparticles were obtained with an average diameter of 62.9 mu m and a size distribution index of 1.9 and showed stable under wide pH range (4.0 to 10.0) and various chemical conditions. Size distribution and chemical stability of the prepared chitosan microparticles were relatively close to those of Sepharose 4B. Polyclonal antibody against zearalenone (ZEN) as a model ligand was coupled onto chitosan microparticles or Sepharose 4B to obtain immunoaffinity columns. Further characterization indicated that chitosan microparticle-based column exhibited a maximum binding capacity of 6.1 mu g/mL gel, higher than that (3.1 mu g/mL gel) of Sepharose 4B-based column, and a column-to-column variation of 6.0%, slightly lower than that (8.6%) of Sepharose 4B-based column. When challenged with cornmeal samples fortified with ZEN at 50 and 100 ng/g, satisfied recoveries of 92.1-100.2% with relative standard deviation (RSD) <= 7.6% and 88.3-107.3% with RSD <= 7.6% were both yielded by chitosan microparticle- and Sepharose 4B-based column, respectively, indicating that the obtained chitosan microparticles could be hopefully used as matrix support for immunoaffinity chromatography with reproducible extraction behavior and high extraction efficiency. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据