4.7 Article

CXCR6 deficiency ameliorates ischemia-reperfusion injury by reducing the recruitment and cytokine production of hepatic NKT cells in a mouse model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 224-234

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.04.021

关键词

Fatty liver; Ischemia-reperfusion injury; Hepatic NKT cells; CXCR6

资金

  1. NIH/NIDDK [R01DK075990]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatty liver is used for transplantation due to organ shortage, but prone to cause complications like ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). NKT cells as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity were reported to infiltrate the liver at the early phase of IRI induced in normal liver. However, the localization mechanism of NKT cells is not precise, and the role of NKT cells in fatty liver IRI is poorly understood. In present murine IRI model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, we demonstrated that although the number reduced in fatty liver, NKT cells still activated and accumulated to fatty liver following IRI, and contributed to IRI by producing inflammatory cytokine IFN-y. We revealed that NKT cells in fatty liver expressed more CXCR6, a vital chemokine receptor; meanwhile, the ligand CXCL16 mRNA expression level in fatty liver was up-regulated. The up-regulation of the CXCR6/CXCL16 axis in fatty liver happened in IRI, which maybe endow NKT cells more chemotaxis. We further found CXCR6 deficiency reduced the recruitment of NKT cells in a tissue-dependent manner, and impaired the IFN-gamma producing capacity of hepatic NKT cells. Serum ALT level and hepatic histology were both improved in CXCR6 deficient mice. The results provide evidence of the pathogenic role of NKT cells in fatty liver IRI, and important localization mechanism involving up-regulated CXCR6/CXCL16. Deficiency of CXCR6 protects the fatty liver from IRI by reducing the recruitment and cytokine production of hepatic NKT cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据