4.4 Article

Evaluation of using ICD-10 code data for respiratory syncytial virus surveillance

期刊

INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 630-637

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/irv.12665

关键词

epidemiology; ICD-10 code; respiratory syncytial virus; sensitivity; specificity; surveillance

资金

  1. World Health Organization [001] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRI) in young children. ICD-10-based syndromic surveillance can transmit data rapidly in a standardized way. Objectives We investigated the use of RSV-specific ICD-10 codes for RSV surveillance. Methods We performed a retrospective descriptive data analysis based on existing ICD-10-based surveillance systems for ALRI in primary and secondary care and a linked virological surveillance in Germany. We described RSV epidemiology and compared the epidemiological findings based on ICD-10 and virological data. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of RSV-specific ICD-10 codes and in combination with ICD-10 codes for acute respiratory infections (ARI) for the identification of laboratory-confirmed RSV infections. Results Based on the ICD-10 and virological data, epidemiology of RSV was described, and common findings were found. The RSV-specific ICD-10 codes had poor sensitivity 6% (95%-CI: 3%-12%) and high specificity 99.8% (95%-CI: 99.6%-99.9%). In children <5 years and in RSV seasons, the sensitivities of RSV-specific ICD-10 codes combined with general ALRI ICD-10 codes J18.-, J20.- and with J12.-, J18.-, J20.-, J21.-, J22 were moderate (44%, 95%-CI: 30%-59%). The specificities of both combinations remained high (91%, 95%-CI: 86%-94%; 90%, 95%-CI: 85%-94%). Conclusions The use of RSV-specific ICD-10 codes may be a useful indicator to describe RSV epidemiology. However, RSV-specific ICD-10 codes underestimate the number of actual RSV infections. This can be overcome by combining RSV-specific and general ALRI ICD-10 codes. Further investigations are required to validate this approach in other settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据