4.7 Article

Green Secure Communication Range-Angle Focusing Quadrature Spatial Modulation Using Frequency Modulated Diverse Retrodirective Array for mmWave Wireless Communications

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 68, 期 7, 页码 6867-6877

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2019.2919921

关键词

Frequency diverse retrodirective array; Millimeter-wave communications; Quadrature spatial modulation QSM); Range-angle dependent

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61871092]
  2. Foundation of Sichuan Province [2018JY0546]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quadrature spatial modulation (QSM) using frequency modulated diverse retrospective array (FMD-RDA) is put forward to achieve green transmission paradigm shift from phased-array-based arrangement. Up to date, the QSM techniques have employed phased-array, but only angular focusing direction is possible without range focusing direction. On the other hand, millimeter-wave (mmWave) scheme is suggested as an alternative approach for fifth-generation because of large bandwidth spectrum. Therefore, this paper studies green secure communication range-angle focusing QSM FMD-RDA in mmWave wireless communication. In FMD-RDA, a small frequency increment is included across the RDA elements to decouple range-angle focusing. More importantly, an attractive advantage of using FMD-RDA is the automatic self tracking feature which alleviate transmitter/receiver's channel state information (CSI) requirement. To ensure secure transmission, we exploit physical layer security to degrade the channel quality of the eavesdropper. Furthermore, low complexity greedy detector is devised to retrieved the information bits at the receiver. We also derived pair-wise error probability, and analyze secrecy sum rate and energy transfer capability. The reported simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme is effective in improving the spectral efficiency with low complexity and no CSI requirement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据