4.7 Article

PL-SLAM: A Stereo SLAM System Through the Combination of Points and Line Segments

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 734-746

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2019.2899783

关键词

Bundle adjustment (BA); line segment features; loop closure; stereo visual simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)

类别

资金

  1. Spanish Government [DPI2017-84827-R, BES-2015-071606]
  2. Andalusian Government [TEP2012-530]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional approaches to stereo visual simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) rely on point features to estimate the camera trajectory and build a map of the environment. In low-textured environments, though, it is often difficult to find a sufficient number of reliable point features and, as a consequence, the performance of such algorithms degrades. This paper proposes PL-SLAM, a stereo visual SLAM system that combines both points and line segments to work robustly in a wider variety of scenarios, particularly in those where point features are scarce or not well-distributed in the image. PL-SLAM leverages both points and line segments at all the instances of the process: visual odometry, keyframe selection, bundle adjustment, etc. We contribute also with a loop-closure procedure through a novel bag-of-words approach that exploits the combined descriptive power of the two kinds of features. Additionally, the resulting mapis richer and more diverse in three-dimensional elements, which can be exploited to infer valuable, high-level scene structures, such as planes, empty spaces, ground plane, etc. (not addressed in this paper). Our proposal has been tested with several popular datasets (such as EuRoC or KITTI), and is compared with state-of-the-art methods such as ORB-SLAM2, revealing a more robust performance in most of the experiments while still running in real time. An open-source version of the PL-SLAM C++ code has been released for the benefit of the community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据