4.8 Article

Current Profile Optimization for Combined State of Charge and State of Health Estimation of Lithium Ion Battery Based on Cramer-Rao Bound Analysis

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 34, 期 7, 页码 7067-7078

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2877294

关键词

Cramer-Rao (CR) bound; current profile design; estimation accuracy; lithium ion battery; multi-scale extended Kalman filter (EKF); State of Charge/State of Health (SoC/SoH) estimation

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-16-1-3108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Online State of Charge (SoC) and State of Health (SoH) estimations are essential for efficient, safe, and reliable operation of Lithium ion batteries. Based on the first-order equivalent-circuit model (ECM), a multi-scale extended Kalman filter is adopted in this paper to estimate ECM parameters and battery SoC using dual time scales. The nature of the battery excitations significantly influences the estimation performance. When the input-output data, i.e., the input current and output voltage, is insufficiently rich in frequency content, the estimation performance is poor. Thus, the excitation current should be optimized for the accurate estimation of parameters and states. A Cramer-Rao bound analysis is conducted considering voltage noise, current amplitude, and current frequency, which shows the loss of accuracy in multi-parameter estimation (estimating all states and parameters) when compared to single-parameter estimation (estimating only one parameter/state). However, it also shows that the loss of accuracy can be significantly reduced when the excitation current is carefully chosen to satisfy certain criteria. Both simulation and experimental results verify the analysis results and show that a current profile with optimal frequency components achieves the best estimation performance, thereby, providing guidelines for designing battery current profiles for improved SoC and SoH estimation performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据