4.7 Article

A Novel Change Detection Method for Multitemporal Hyperspectral Images Based on Binary Hyperspectral Change Vectors

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2894339

关键词

Binary codewords; change detection (CD); hyperspectral (HS) images; multitemporal images

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperspectral (HS) images provide a dense sampling of target spectral signatures. Thus, they can be used in a multitemporal framework to detect and discriminate between different kinds of fine spectral change effectively. However, due to the complexity of the problem and the limited amount of multitemporal images and reference data, only a few works in the literature addressed change detection (CD) in HS images. In this paper, we present a novel method for unsupervised multiple CD in multitemporal HS images based on a discrete representation of the change information. Differently from the state-of-the-art methods, which address the high dimensionality of the data using band reduction or selection techniques, in this paper, we focus our attention on the representation and exploitation of the change information present in each hand. After a band-by-band pixel-based subtraction of the multitemporal images, we define the hyperspectral change vectors (HCVs). The change information in the HCVs is then simplified. To this end, the radiometric information of each band is separately analyzed to generate a quantized discrete representation of the HCVs. This discrete representation is explored by considering the hierarchical nature of the changes in HS images. A tree representation is defined and used to discriminate between different kinds of change. The proposed method has been tested on a simulated data set and two real multitemporal data sets acquired by the Hyperion sensor over agricultural areas. Experimental results confirm that the discrete representation of the change information is effective when used for unsupervised CD in multitemporal HS data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据