4.7 Article

Impact Localization and Severity Estimation on Composite Structure Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors by Least Square Support Vector Regression

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 4463-4470

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2901453

关键词

Composite aircraft structures structural health monitoring; BVID; fiber Bragg grating; least square-support vector regression (LS-SVR)

资金

  1. Aeronautics Research and Development Board (AR&DB), New Delhi, India, through the ACECOST Phase 3 Program [DARO/08/1051641/M/I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-velocity impact (LVI) events in carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) structures are a major concern as they result in barely visible impact damage which can reduce the strength and stiffness of impacted structure. Detection of such impact events in terms of location and severity will be a significant milestone for aerospace structural health monitoring applications. This can result in well-targeted inspection programs thereby reducing the time and cost of periodic inspections. One of the easy and efficient ways of getting the impact response of a structure is through strain measurement. LVI event monitoring using fiber Bragg grating sensors has evolved as an attractive choice in recent years along with various soft computing algorithms and advanced signal processing techniques. Machine learning techniques such as artificial neural networks and support vector machine are widely used to localize impact events. Getting information regarding the ensuing damage due to LVI event from the strain response is not straight forward as it could involve estimation of intermediate parameters like energy/force of impact, which are further related with probable damage size. This paper demonstrates least square support vector regression-based algorithm to localize impact event in terms of X- and Y-coordinates and its energy on a CFRP plate-like structure and its comparison with other algorithms cited in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据