4.7 Article

Nonlinear Graphene-Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Heterostructure Refractive Index Sensor

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 4435-4442

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2897345

关键词

Bragg grating device; graphene based sensor; nanoscale component; optical sensors; refractive index sensor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a refractive index sensor based on nonlinear graphene-transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) Bragg reflector (BR) is proposed and analyzed. The Bragg wave-length and the reflection width can be engineered by the number of TMD layers and the intensity of the input, and this case is dissimilar to the specified resonance wavelength of the surface plasmon resonances with constant resonance wavelength. The low loss nature and high nonlinearity of TMDs accompanying the graphene brilliant properties let the design of more flexible, narrower resonance, and lower loss sensors. We theoretically compute the dielectric function of the structure utilizing the quantum electrostatic heterostructure method and numerically simulate our proposed sensor by the three-dimensional finite difference time domain. The simulation results reveal that the effective refractive index of the sensor directly controls the Bragg wavelength of the proposed sensor. We tune the Bragg wavelength and the bandwidth of the reflection of the BR sensor by input intensity. In our proposed sensor, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the BR reflection spectra decreases from 12 nm in the linear regime to 1.5 nm in the nonlinear regime, which let have 1099 (nm/RIU) sensitivity with an input intensity of 6.18 (MW/cm(2)). In the nonlinear regime, a variation of 0.01 in the refractive index causes 20-nm redshift in the BR wavelength, and with respect to the 1.5-nm FWHM, the reflection spectra are completely recognizable. Due to its sensitivity, this kind of heterostructure sensor can be utilized in the design of sensitive optical biosensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据