4.6 Article

On the evolutionary origin of Neotropical cavefish Ancistrus cryptophthalmus (Siluriformes, Loricariidae) based on the mitogenome and genetic structure of cave and surface populations

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 842, 期 1, 页码 157-171

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-019-04033-y

关键词

Fish; Molecular taxonomy; mtDNA; Next-generation DNA sequencing; Stygobitic

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E-26/202.780/2018]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  4. Fundo de Incentivo a Pesquisa da Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas Gerais (FIP PUC Minas)
  5. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [306155/2018-4, 308334/2018-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolutionary process of adaptation to the cave environment leads to extreme genetic, morphological, and physiological modifications commonly known as stygomorphism. The cave-dwelling armored catfish Ancistrus cryptophthalmus is a good model to understand the evolutionary processes of stygomorphism in the Neotropics as its ecology and morphology have been studied in detail. Interestingly, it has been found a non-stygomorphic epigean population named Ancistrus sp. This population is morphologically distinct to the hypogean population of A. cryptophthalmus as they present better-developed ocular structures and intense pigmentation. Here we used Illumina sequencing technology to produce partial genome sequences for specimens of Ancistrus sp. and A. cryptophthalmus; we also genotyped molecular markers from individuals of both species. Based on the high level of mitogenome similarity and metapopulation connectivity between the surface and cave populations, we suggest that the evolution of stygomorphisms observed in A. cryptophthalmus may be the result of morphologic modification, by natural selection, of Ancistrus sp. surface population to colonize the harsh cave environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据