4.5 Article

G-quadruplex-mediated reduction of a pathogenic mitochondrial heteroplasmy

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 28, 期 19, 页码 3163-3174

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddz153

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disease-associated variants in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are frequently heteroplasmic, a state of co-existence with the wild-type genome. Because heteroplasmy correlates with the severity and penetrance of disease, improvement in the ratio between these genomes in favor of the wild-type, known as heteroplasmy shifting, is potentially therapeutic. We evaluated known pathogenic mtDNA variants and identified those with the potential for allele-specific differences in the formation of non-Watson-Crick G-quadruplex (GQ) structures. We found that the Leigh syndrome (LS)-associated m.10191C variant promotes GQ formation within local sequence in vitro. Interaction of this sequence with a small molecule GQ-binding agent, berberine hydrochloride, further increased GQ stability. The GQ formed at m.10191C differentially impeded the processivity of the mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (Pol gamma) in vitro, providing a potential means to favor replication of the wild-type allele. We tested the potential for shifting heteroplasmy through the cyclical application of two different mitochondria-targeted GQ binding compounds in primary fibroblasts from patients with m.10191T>C heteroplasmy. Treatment induced alternating mtDNA depletion and repopulation and was effective in shifting heteroplasmy towards the non-pathogenic allele. Similar treatment of pathogenic heteroplasmies that do not affect GQ formation did not induce heteroplasmy shift. Following treatment, heteroplasmic m.10191T>C cells had persistent improvements and heteroplasmy and a corresponding increase in maximal mitochondrial oxygen consumption. This study demonstrates the potential for using small-molecule GQ-binding agents to induce genetic and functional improvements in m.10191T>C heteroplasmy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据