4.4 Article

Incidence of false-positive transmissions during remote rhythm monitoring with implantable loop recorders

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 75-80

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.015

关键词

Atrial fibrillation; Cryptogenic stroke; Implantable loop recorder; Remote transmissions; Syncope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Implantable loop recorder (ILR) is preferred strategy for prolonged rhythm monitoring. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and causes of false-positive (FP) diagnoses during remote monitoring with ILR. METHODS During a 4-week study period, all consecutive remote transmissions in patients with ILR (Reveal LINQ, Medtronic) implanted for atrial fibrillation (AF) surveillance, cryptogenic stroke (CS), and syncope were reviewed. A nurse specializing in device management and an electrophysiologist adjudicated all transmissions. Primary endpoint of the study was incidence of FP in patients with AF, CS, and syncope. RESULTS A total of 695 remote transmissions (scheduled downloads: 414; Alerts: 281) sent from 559 patients were adjudicated. The majority of patients had ILR for AF surveillance (n = 321), followed by CS (n = 168) and syncope (n = 70) with nominal programming for rhythm diagnosis. Incidence of FP transmissions during the study period was 46%, 86%, and 71% in patients with AF, CS, and syncope, respectively. Incidence of FP transmissions was higher in patients with CS and syncope than in patients with AF (P < .001). For scheduled transmissions, primary causes of FP were signal dropout and undersensing; for alert transmissions, primary reasons for FP were premature atrial and ventricular ectopy. CONCLUSION Incidence of FP during remote monitoring with nominal settings on this ILR was substantial, ranging from 46% to 86% depending on the indication for implantation. Adjudication of these transmissions required a considerable time commitment from electrophysiologists and device clinic personnel but would be required to avoid misdiagnosis and potential errors in clinical management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据