4.3 Article

Effects of Chronic Dust Load On Leaf Pigments of the Landscape Plant Murraya Paniculata

期刊

GESUNDE PFLANZEN
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 249-258

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10343-019-00469-3

关键词

Chlorophyll; Dust; Murraya paniculata; Photosynthetic pigments; Porphyrin

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801813, 31701664]
  2. Science and Technology Innovative Engineering Project in Shaanxi province, China [2017ZDXM-NY-017]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M631207, 70 2017M623254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past few years, a considerable decrease in growth and development of landscape plants was recorded, possibly due to chronic exposure to toxic pollutants, with dust probably playing a major role. In the current study, Murraya paniculata were grown in a greenhouse for a period of 4 months, during which roadside dust was sprinkled daily on the slightly damp leaves at different concentrations: T-0 (0 g/plant-control), T-1 (1 g/plant), T-2 (3 g/plant) and T-3 (5 g/plant). Roadside sediments were collected with a vacuum pump and passed through a filter to obtain a fine particle size (less than 800 mu m). Phenotypic studies of leaves revealed that continuous addition of undesired dust effluents affects the foliar surface of the leaves and changes its morphology. Treatment with dust significantly increased the abscisic acid concentration of leaves and shoots and the effects were more severe in high level of dust treatments. Compared to control, chlorophyll, porphyrin, chlorophyllide and pheophytin contents were significantly decreased in the dust treated groups. In contrast, carotenoid and polar carotenoid contents were not influenced by dust (p > 0.05), while non-polar carotenoid contents were significantly reduced by different levels of dust treatments. This study concludes that roadside dust depositions have degradative effects on photosynthetic pigments, with extensive effects on growth and development of plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据