4.5 Article

Analysis and Mapping of an Updated Terrestrial Heat Flow Data Set

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 4001-4024

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019GC008389

关键词

global heat flow; oceanic cooling models; hydrothermal cooling; similarity method; heat flow map

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The number of heat flow measurements at the Earth surface has significantly increased since the last global analysis (Pollack et al., 1993, ), and the most recent of them provide insights into key locations. This paper presents a new compilation, which includes approximately 70,000 measurements. Continental heat flow (67 mWm(-2)) does not change significantly, but the differences are more important for oceanic heat flow. The divergence with conductive cooling models is reduced significantly for young ages of the seafloor, since the most recent measurements (92 mWm(-2)) are significantly higher on average than the older ones (79 mWm(-2)). This is related to a better quality and a better sampling of measurements in regions affected by hydrothermal circulation. The total Earth heat loss derived from these most recent measurements is estimated to similar to 40-42 TW and represents only 3-5 TW less than with a conductive cooling model (similar to 45-47 TW). Hydrothermal heat loss in the oceanic domain is estimated with a new method based on the ruggedness of the seafloor and represents similar to 1.5 TW more than previous estimates. The heat flow variability on continents is so large that defining a trend with stratigraphic or tectono-thermal age is difficult and makes extrapolation from age a poor predictor. On the other hand, additional geological and geophysical information can be combined with age for better predictions. A generalized similarity method was used here to predict heat flow on a global 0.5 degrees x 0.5 degrees grid. The agreement with local measurements is generally good and increases with the number and quality of proxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据