4.4 Article

Geosmithia species in southeastern USA and their affinity to beetle vectors and tree hosts

期刊

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 168-183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2019.02.005

关键词

Bark beetles; Scolytinae; Ectosymbiotic; Fungal community; Bionectriaceae

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB 1556283]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, USDA APHIS Farm Bill section 10007
  3. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services - Division of Plant Industry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fungal genus Geosmithia is best known due to one species, G. morbida, which is vectored by the walnut twig beetle (WTB) and contributes to Thousand Cankers Disease (TCD) on walnut and wingnut trees. However, the genus is globally very diverse and abundant, and dominates a ubiquitous but understudied niche - the twig-infesting, phloem-feeding bark beetle mycobiome. The Geosmithia community in North America is only now beginning to be described. Very limited information is available for the South East, despite the region's potential to be a Geosmithia diversity hotspot. To survey the Geosmithia community in the subtropical USA, to assess their beetle and tree associations, and to test for the presence of G. morbida, we systematically deployed branch sections of nine tree species, including three Juglandaceae, in North Florida. We recovered 55 Geosmithia isolates from 195 beetle specimens from 45 exposed branch units. Neither G. morbida nor its beetle vector were detected. We identified 14 Geosmithia species; those in the G. pallida species complex were the most prevalent. Four undescribed phylogenetic species were recovered, indicating that the Geosmithia diversity in North America remains under-documented. Analysis of the association of Geosmithia with beetles and trees suggested that most species are generalists, five display preference for certain tree species, and none is specific to any beetle species. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据