4.3 Article

Genome editing of different strains of Aureobasidium melanogenum using an efficient Cre/loxp site-specific recombination system

期刊

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
卷 123, 期 10, 页码 723-731

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2019.06.001

关键词

Aureobasidium spp.; Cre recombinase; Cre/loxp site-specific editing system; Fermentation products; Gene editing

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31770061]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590657]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been well known that different strains of Aureobasidium spp. can produce commercial pullulan, polymalate, liamocin, intracellular lipids, gluconic acid, siderophore, melanin and various enzymes. In order to fully elucidate their synthetic pathways and regulation, it is necessary to have an efficient gene editing system for genetic modification of Aureobasidium spp. In this study, an efficient Cre/loxp site-specific recombination system (pAMGDIoxp-1, pAMEX1ox-1 and pAMCRE1) was constructed. It was found that they could be successfully used to sequentially delete and express many genes in different strains of A. melanogenum. After each round of gene disruption and expression, over 0.5 positive cells per 1000 competent cells and over 49.8 positive transformants per 1.0 mu g DNA were achieved. After each round of the antibiotics gene excision by using the Cre-loxp site-specific recombination, over 95.4 % of the antibiotics-resistant cells became sensitive to both hygromycin B and nourseothricin again. This demonstrated that the Cre/loxp site-specific recombination system constructed in this study can efficiently be used to simultaneously delete and express many genes in different strains of A. melanogenum. These systems are promising approaches for the easily modifying genomics of the yeast-like fungal strains with enhanced metabolic pathways through multicopy gene deletion and expression. (C) 2019 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据