4.7 Article

Pore-scale monitoring of CO2 and N2 flooding processes in a tight formation under reservoir conditions using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR): A case study

期刊

FUEL
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 34-41

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.103

关键词

Tight sandstone reservoirs; CO2 and N-2 flooding; Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); High temperature and pressure; Pore-scale displacement behaviors

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2015CB250904]
  2. Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team of SWPU [2017CXTD04]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province [2017JY0122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent reports have demonstrated that gas injection can improve oil recovery of tight reservoirs after natural depletion, with major projects in progress worldwide. There is however a lack of understanding of the gas displacement behaviors at pore-scale especially under reservoir conditions. Herein we conducted an experimental investigation of CO2 and N-2 flooding in the Lucaogou tight formation at 35.0 MPa and 80 degrees C. The flooding dynamics were continuously monitored by use of low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to map the displacement processes at pore-scale and quantify the reduction of oil saturation in-situ. We observed that the overall oil recoveries of CO2 and N-2 flooding were 38.4% and 35.1%, respectively. Due to the interactions between the oil phase and CO2, a uniform displacement along the core plug was yielded by CO2 flushing, indicated by the 1D spatial distribution of local oil saturation and 2D transverse images. Interestingly, during CO2 flooding, the major reduction of NMR T-2 signals occurred in the large pores (4.2 ms < T-2 < 252.4 ms), whereas in the case of N-2 flooding, the main change was found both in small pores (T-2 < 4.5 ms) and large pores (4.5 ms < T-2 < 432.3 ms). The results of this study supplement earlier observations from pore scale and can provide insights into oil recovery improvement of tight reservoirs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据