4.7 Article

Catalytic effect of transglutaminase mediated by myofibrillar protein crosslinking under microwave irradiation

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 45-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.097

关键词

Microwave; Myofibrillar protein; Tranglutaminase; Crosslinking; Gel property; Secondary structure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31822038]
  2. National Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for Science Technology [2018YFD0400600]
  3. Open Project Program of Key Laboratory of Refrigeration and Conditioning Aquatic Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs [KLRCAPP2018-01]
  4. National First-class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology [JUFSTR20180102]
  5. program of Collaborative innovation center of food safety and quality control in Jiangsu Province
  6. six talent peak high-level talent project of Jiangsu Province [2015-NY-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microwave (MW) heating improved the activity of transglutaminase (TGase) by inducing conformational changes due to structural modification. However, when TGase and myofibrillar protein were heated, the solubility and degree of crosslinking were similar. Further, the gel properties of the mixed solution pre-gelled by MW heating were lower than that obtained with water bath (WB) pre-gelling. We compared the effects on myofibrillar proteins at the same heating rate, our results showed that MW promoted aggregation, as the particle distribution tended toward larger molecular size. The increase of random coil as investigated by circular dichroism (CD) indicated that WB induced the unfolding of myofibrillar protein. MW enhanced intermolecular forces by engendering more disulfide bonds, which hindered the catalysis by TGase. Finally, SDS-PAGE indicated that the myosin molecules had more head crosslinking during MW treatment. MW and WB cause different response behaviors of myofibrillar protein, thereby affecting the catalytic effect of TGase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据