4.7 Article

Structure-guided probing of the leukotriene C4 binding site in human multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1; ABCC1)

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 10, 页码 10692-10704

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201900140R

关键词

ABC transporter; homology modeling; structure-function; bipartite binding site

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [133584]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human multidrug resistance protein 1 (hMRP1) transporter is implicated in cancer multidrug resistance as well as immune responses involving its physiologic substrate, glutathione (GSH)-conjugated leukotriene C-4 (LTC4). LTC4 binds a bipartite site on hMRP1, which a recent cryoelectron microscopy structure of LTC4-bound bovine Mrp1 depicts as composed of a positively charged pocket and a hydrophobic (H) pocket that binds the GSH moiety and surrounds the fatty acid moiety, respectively, of LTC4. Here, we show that single Ala and Leu substitutions of H-pocket hMRP1-Met(1093) have no effect on LTC4 binding or transport. Estrone 3-sulfate transport is also unaffected, but both hMRP1-Met(1093) mutations eliminate estradiol glucuronide transport, demonstrating that these steroid conjugates have binding sites distinct from each other and from LTC4. To eliminate LTC4 transport by hMRP1, mutation of 3 H-pocket residues was required (W553/M1093/W1246A), indicating that H-pocket amino acids are key to the vastly different affinities of hMRP1 for LTC4 vs. GSH alone. Unlike organic anion transport, hMRP1-mediated drug resistance was more diminished by Ala than Leu substitution of Met(1093). Although our findings generally support a structure in which H-pocket residues bind the lipid tail of LTC4, their critical and differential role in the transport of conjugated estrogens and anticancer drugs remains unexplained.-Conseil, G., Arama-Chayoth, M., Tsfadia, Y., Cole, S. P. C. Structure-guided probing of the leukotriene C-4 binding site in human multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1; ABCC1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据