期刊
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 207-212出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0163278719856406
关键词
PROMIS; anxiety; depression; pain interference; validity; orthopedic surgery
资金
- NCATS NIH HHS [U54 TR001013, UL1 TR002537, U54 TR001356] Funding Source: Medline
- NCCIH NIH HHS [R34 AT008349] Funding Source: Medline
- NINDS NIH HHS [T32 NS045549] Funding Source: Medline
- NINR NIH HHS [P20 NR018081] Funding Source: Medline
The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha s ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r= .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r= .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据