4.2 Article

Periventricular White Matter Lesions Influence Gait Functions in Parkinson's Disease

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY
卷 81, 期 3-4, 页码 120-127

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000499908

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Gait analysis; Portable gait rhythmogram; White matter lesion

资金

  1. Promoting Clinical Trials for Development of New Drugs and Medical Devices from Japan Agency for Medical Research and development, AMED
  2. Shiseikai Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We quantitatively evaluated the gait of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients over a 10-m course during normal walking and during dual-task walking while performing a calculation task, and clarified which parts of white matter lesions (WML) influence gait in PD patients. Methods: Gait parameters, including walking speed, gait cycle, stride length, and left-right instability, were measured in 64 PD patients and 20 controls who walked 10 m with normal gait and as they were performing a calculation task. WML on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of PD patients were scored according to Scheltens' criteria, and associations with gait parameters were investigated. Results: Compared to controls, the PD group showed decreased walking speed and narrowed stride (p < 0.05), and the stride length and step time coefficient of variation changed significantly during the calculation task (p < 0.001). Frontal lobe functions correlated positively with walking speed and stride during the calculation task in patients with PD (p < 0.05). The total score for periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) on MRI correlated with walking speed and stride (p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis revealed significant correlations between walking speed and frontal cap of PVH, and between stride and occipital cap (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Gait of PD patients deteriorated not only due to motor dysfunction but also due to mental burden in association with frontal lobe function and periventricular lesions of cerebral white matter. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据