4.7 Article

Dioscin inhibits intimal hyperplasia in rat carotid artery balloon injury model through inhibition of the MAPK-FoxM1 pathway

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 854, 期 -, 页码 213-223

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.03.050

关键词

Dioscin; Intimal hyperplasia; Vascular smooth muscle cells; MAPK; FoxM1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81400321]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation and migration are crucial events in the pathological course of atherosclerosis and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Dioscin has been shown to exhibit powerful cardiovascular protective effects and potent therapeutic potential in cancer owing to the inhibition of cell proliferation and migration. However, its effects on arterial wall hypertrophy-related diseases caused by VSMC proliferation and migration remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of dioscin on intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in vivo, its effects on VSMC proliferation and migration in vitro, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. Results showed that dioscin treatment significantly inhibited VSMC proliferation and intimal thickening after balloon injury. In cultured VSMCs, treatment with dioscin significantly decreased fetal bovine serum or platelet-derived growth factor-induced cell proliferation and migration. Moreover, dioscin inhibited the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and expression of Forkhead box M1 (FoxM1) and its downstream target genes. FoxM1 knockdown with shRNA partially counteracted the inhibitory effects of dioscin on cell proliferation and migration. In conclusion, we demonstrated that dioscin attenuated neointima formation in response to balloon injury by suppressing VSMC proliferation and migration through MAPK-FoxM1 pathway. Our data suggested that dioscin might be a potential therapeutic agent for atherosclerosis and restenosis after PCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据