4.5 Article

Where is my mouth? Rapid experience-dependent plasticity of perceived mouth position in humans

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 50, 期 11, 页码 3814-3830

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14508

关键词

body ownership; body representation; proprioception; tactile illusion; tactile perception

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/M013901/1]
  2. Colgate-Palmolive Company [A-2014-307-OC]
  3. MRC [MR/M013901/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several neural and behavioural studies propose that movements of the hand to the mouth are a key motor primitive of the primate sensorimotor system. These studies largely focus on sensorimotor coordination required to reach the mouth with the hand. However, hand-to-mouth movement depends on representing the location of the mouth. We report 5 experiments using a novel dental model illusion (DMI) that investigates the neural representation of mouth position. When participants used their right index finger to touch the teeth of an unseen dental model in synchrony with the experimenter's tactile stimulation of the participant's own teeth, participants felt that the position of their own teeth was shifted towards the dental model and stated that their right index finger was touching their actual teeth. This result replicated across four experiments and provides an oral analogue to the rubber hand illusion. Synchrony between the two tactile motions was necessary condition to elicit DMI (Experiment 3). DMI was moderately affected by manipulating the macrogeometric or microgeometric tactile properties of the dental model, suggesting cognitive images of one's own oral morphology play a modest role (Experiments 4 and 5). Neuropsychological theories often stress that hand-to-mouth movement emerges early in development or may even be innate. Our research suggests that general, bottom-up principles of multisensory plasticity suffice to provide spatial representation of the egocentric core, including mouth position.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据