4.7 Article

Naphthyl quinoxaline thymidine conjugate is a potent anticancer agent post UVA activation and elicits marked inhibition of tumor growth through vaccination

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 255-264

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.03.051

关键词

Antitumor agent; Thymidine analog; UVA activation; Immunogenic cell death; Cancer cell vaccine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [81372403, 81671812]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anticancer anthracyclines are cytotoxic drugs that can induce antitumor immune response as a secondary effect through immunogenic cell death (ICD) mechanism. However, the immunogenic potency is quite limited, possibly due to that these chemotherapeutic agents are not specifically developed as ICD inducers. Thus, new drug entities through studies focusing on enhanced ICD induction would significantly promote antitumor immune response in the vaccination application. We report here a naphthyl quinoxaline thymidine conjugate as a new class of cytotoxic compounds that effectively induced in vivo antitumor activity through the vaccination application. Synthesized naphthyl quinoxaline conjugates were weak fluorescent thymidine analog yet exhibited a pronounced anticancer activity in the low nanomolar range post UVA activation. The potent activity of naphthyl conjugate was able to induce the marked detection of LCD markers including ATP and HMGB1 extracellular and calreticulin intracellularly at 2 h post UVA activation. Most importantly, mice vaccinated with cells treated with naphthyl conjugate plus UVA exhibited complete tumor growth inhibition in the tumor challenge study, and the induced immunogenic inhibition was much more effective than that of mitoxantrone anthracycline drug. All these results demonstrate the high potential of naphthyl quinoxaline conjugate for the cancer cell vaccine against tumor. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据