4.7 Article

Difference between selenite and selenate in selenium transformation and the regulation of cadmium accumulation in Brassica chinensis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 24, 页码 24532-24541

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05705-x

关键词

Accumulation; Translocation; Pak choi; Selenium; Selenomethionine; Selenium speciation

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-23-B16]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Se can regulate Cd accumulation and translocation in plants; however, such effects can be controversial because of the differences in plant species and Se species. In this study, pak choi was cultured under hydroponic conditions, and the effects of selenite and selenate on Cd accumulation were investigated in the edible parts of this vegetable. The results showed gradual improvements in the effects of the two Se species on the Cd content in pak choi shoots at the four assessed growing stages. Selenite did not lead to significant changes in Cd accumulation in the shoots until day 40, when it significantly reduced the accumulation by 34%. Selenate was always found to increase the Cd content in the shoots, and the differences on days 19 and 40 were 16% and 45%, respectively, compared with those of the Cd (only) treatment. Accordingly, selenate invariably enhanced Cd translocation from the roots to the shoots, whereas selenite insignificantly reduced the translocation only on day 40. Generally, selenomethionine (SeMet) accounted for much larger proportions in selenite-treated plants, while SeO42- was the dominant Se species in selenate-treated plants. However, under both Se treatments, the SeMet proportion increased substantially from day 19 to day 40 when that of SeO42- exhibited a drastic decrease; therefore, the relative proportion of seleno-amino acids to SeO42- may be the key factor for the regulation of Cd accumulation in pak choi via treatment with selenite and selenate at the different growing stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据