4.8 Article

Direct Observations of the Occlusion of Soil Organic Matter within Calcite

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 14, 页码 8097-8104

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06807

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471245, 41071208]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0200900]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662017PY061, 2662017JC020]
  4. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global soil carbon cycling plays a key role in regulating and stabilizing the earth's climate change because of soils with amounts of carbon at least three times greater than those of other ecological systems. Soil minerals have also been shown to underlie the persistence of soil organic matter (SOM) through both adsorption and occlusion, but the microscopic mechanisms that control the latter process are poorly understood. Here, using time-resolved in situ atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe how calcite, a representative mineral in alkaline soils, interacts with humic substances, we show that following adsorption, humic substances are gradually occluded by the advancing steps of spirals on the calcite (10 (1) over bar4) face grown in relatively high supersaturated solutions, through the embedment, compression, and closure of humic substance particles into cavities. This occlusion progress is inhibited by phytate at high concentrations (10-100 mu M) due to the formation of phytate-Ca precipitates on step edges to prevent the step advancement, whereas phytate at relatively low concentrations (<= 1 mu M) and oxalate at high concentrations (100 mu M) have little effect on this process. These in situ observations may provide new insights into the organo-mineral interaction, resulting in the incorporation of humic substances into minerals with a longer storage time to delay degradation in soils. This will improve our understanding of carbon cycling and immobilization in soil ecological systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据