4.8 Article

Effects of Sulfidation and Nitrate on the Reduction of N-Nitrosodimethylamine by Zerovalent Iron

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 16, 页码 9744-9754

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02419

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program of the U.S. Department of Defense [ER-2308, ER-2620, ER-2621]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777117, 21522704]
  3. program of China Scholarships Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Competition among oxidizing species in groundwater and wastewater for the reductive capacity of zerovalent selectivity for reduction of contaminants over water is improved iron (ZVI) makes the selectivity of ZVI for target contaminant degradation over other reduction pathways a major determinant 4 the feasibility of ZVI-based water treatment processes. The by sulfidation, but the effect of sulfidation on other competing reactions is not known. The interaction between these competing reactions was investigated using N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) as the target contaminant, nitrate as a co-contaminant, and micrometer-sized ZVI with and without sulfidation. Unsulfidated ZVI reduced NDMA to dimethylamine via N,N-dimethylhydrazine, but the addition of nitrate decreased the rate of NDMA reduction and increased the quantity of intermediate observed. With sulfidated ZVI, the kinetics and products of NDMA reduction were similar to those with unsulfidated ZVI, but no inhibitory effect of nitrate was observed. Conversely, the reduction of nitrate which dominated NDMA reduction in unsulfidated ZVI systems was strongly inhibited by sulfidation. H-2 and Fe2+ generation by sulfidated ZVI was almost independent of nitrate concentration. Therefore, sulfidation improved the efficiency of NDMA reduction by ZVI in the presence of nitrate mainly by inhibiting nitrate reduction. The shift in selectivity of ZVI for NDMA over nitrate upon sulfidation was due to replacement of Fe-0/FexOy surface sites with FeS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据