4.7 Article

Amplification of risks to water supply at 1.5 °C and 2 °C in drying climates: a case study for Melbourne, Australia

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab26ef

关键词

Paris Agreement; water supply; drought; drought risk; desalination; 1.5 degrees C; 2.0 degrees C

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Linkage Project [LP150100062]
  2. Melbourne Water
  3. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT120100130]
  4. ARC DECRA [DE180100638]
  5. Earth Systems and Climate Change Hub - Australian government's National Environmental Science Program
  6. NCI facility in Australia
  7. CLEX
  8. Australian Bureau ofMeteorology
  9. Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human-induced climate change poses a major threat to the reliable water supply in many highly populated regions. Here we combine hydrological and climate model simulations to evaluate risks to the water supply under projected shifts in the climate at the Paris Agreement warming levels. Modelling the primary surface water sources for Melbourne, Australia, we project that the risk of severe water supply shortage to the climate-dependent portion of the system increases substantially as global warming increases from 1.5 degrees C to 2.0 degrees C. Risks are further exacerbated by increases in water demand but substantially ameliorated by supply augmentation from desalination. We demonstrate that reductions in precipitation, rising temperature and growth in water demand combine to substantially amplify the risk of severe water supply shortage under near-term global warming in the absence of a climate-independent supply. This risk amplification is not as apparent in assessments based on meteorological drought alone. With the diminishing opportunity of meeting the 1.5 degrees C Paris target, our study highlights the need to accelerate greenhouse gas mitigation efforts to reduce risks to climate dependent water supply systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据