4.7 Article

Direct Z-Scheme charge transfer in heterostructured MoO3/g-C3N4 photocatalysts and the generation of active radicals in photocatalytic dye degradations

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 338-345

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.010

关键词

Graphitic carbon nitride; Molybdenum trioxide; Z-Scheme; Dye photodegradation; Superoxide radical

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41772264]
  2. Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Foundation of Sichuan Province [18YYJC1745]
  3. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection [SKLGP2018Z001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic degradation is an attractive strategy to purify waste water contaminated by macromolecular organics. Compared with the single-component photocatalysts, heterostructures of different semiconductors have been widely used to improve the photocatalytic performance. In this work, we fabricate a hetero-structured photocatalyst consisting of two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanosheets and commercial MoO3 microparticles through a simple mixing and annealing process. The photocatalytic performance was evaluated in various dye degradation reactions, especially Rhodamine (RhB) degradation. The MoO3/g-C3N4 composite shown a significant improvement compared with individual MoO3 or g-C(3)N(4)as well as their physical mixture. By applying electron spin resonance (ESR) spin-trap spectra, radical scavenge experiments and electrochemical analysis, we find that a direct Z-scheme charge transfer between MoO3 and g-C3N4 not only causes an accumulation of electrons in g-C3N4 and holes in MoO3, but also boosts the formation of superoxide radical and hydroxyl radical. The superoxide radical and hole dominate the photocatalytic degradation, while the hydroxyl radical plays a negligible role and its production can be suppressed by lowering the pH value. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据