4.5 Article

Performance of Seven Water Quality Indices (WQIs) in a Mediterranean River

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7652-4

关键词

Water quality index; Physicochemical parameters; Water quality assessment; Surface water bodies; Qualitative classification; Water pollution; Vosvozis River

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The comparative performance of seven widely used Water Quality Indices (WQIs) is evaluated in a fluvial water body. The computation of the individual WQIs was based on bi-weekly measurements of eleven water quality parameters in Vosvozis River situated in Rhodope Prefecture, North Greece. The sampling campaign lasted 16 months (from August 2005 to November 2006), and over this period, the individual parameters were measured at three gauging stations along the river. The indices which were applied were the Prati's Index of Pollution, Bhargava's Index, Oregon WQI, National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) WQI, Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment (CCME) WQI, Dinius' Second Index, and the Weighted Arithmetic WQI. Apart from the computation of the above WQIs and the subsequent qualitative classification of the water body, the most important quality parameters per methodology were determined through the calculation of the correlation coefficient between each water quality parameter and the final WQI value. The results showed that Bhargava's Index along with NSF WQI tend to classify water bodies into superior quality classes, Prati's Index into slightly lower categories, whereas Oregon and CCME WQIs were found to be relatively stricter, giving results ranging between the lowest classes of the qualitative ranking. These findings confirm those emerged by our previous studies while they are also partially in line with similar studies comparing a smaller number of indices. CCME WQI is suggested as the most appropriate, among the examined indices, since it is both conservative and adequately sensitive to reflect changes in water quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据