4.6 Article

Entropy and Information within Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e21070662

关键词

intrinsically disordered proteins; Shannon entropy; information theory; evolutionary conservation; conformational entropy; low-complexity sequences; liquid-liquid phase separation; post-translational modifications; conformational ensembles; biophysics

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [FDN-148375, PJT-148532, MOP-119579]
  2. Canada Research Chair program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioinformatics and biophysical studies of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (IDRs) note the high entropy at individual sequence positions and in conformations sampled in solution. This prevents application of the canonical sequence-structure-function paradigm to IDRs and motivates the development of new methods to extract information from IDR sequences. We argue that the information in IDR sequences cannot be fully revealed through positional conservation, which largely measures stable structural contacts and interaction motifs. Instead, considerations of evolutionary conservation of molecular features can reveal the full extent of information in IDRs. Experimental quantification of the large conformational entropy of IDRs is challenging but can be approximated through the extent of conformational sampling measured by a combination of NMR spectroscopy and lower-resolution structural biology techniques, which can be further interpreted with simulations. Conformational entropy and other biophysical features can be modulated by post-translational modifications that provide functional advantages to IDRs by tuning their energy landscapes and enabling a variety of functional interactions and modes of regulation. The diverse mosaic of functional states of IDRs and their conformational features within complexes demands novel metrics of information, which will reflect the complicated sequence-conformational ensemble-function relationship of IDRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据