4.7 Article

An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy DEMATEL method combined with Choquet integral for sustainable solid waste management

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.04.005

关键词

Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set; DEMATEL; Choquet integral; Correlation analysis; Multi-criteria decision making

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
  2. University Malaysia Terengganu [FRGS 59389]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771156, 71501135]
  4. 2019 Sichuan Planning Project of Social Science, China [SC18A007]
  5. Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Sichuan Province, China [Xq18A01, LYC18-02]
  6. Project of Innovation at Sichuan University, China [2018hhs-43]
  7. National Spanish project [TIN2016-75850-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) is a pragmatic method used to construct the structural correlation of criteria in a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. This paper proposes modifications to DEMATEL. Different from the typical DEMATEL which utilizes crisp numbers, this modification introduces interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers to enhance judgements in group decision-making environment. We use the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator instead of the typical averaging operator to aggregate decision-makers' preferences. This paper proposes a combination of interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, DEMATEL and the Choquet integral to allow a strong interrelationship between the sum of rows and the sum of columns of criteria in structural correlation analysis. The feasibility and applicability of the proposed method is illustrated by a numerical example about sustainable solid waste management. The result indicates that 'collaboration and synergy' is the most influential criterion for sustainable solid waste management. Comparative results are presented to show the validity of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据