4.4 Article

Hydrogen production by glycerol dry reforming over rhenium promoted Ni-based catalyst supported on Santa Barbara Amorphous 15 (SBA-15)

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1645762

关键词

Glycerol; dry reforming; hydrogen; SBA-15; rhenium

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Malaysia [FRGS/1/2018/TK02/UMP/02/12 (RDU190197)]
  2. Universiti Malaysia Pahang [RDU1803118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the glycerol dry reforming (GDR) reaction using rhenium (Re) promoted on Ni-based catalyst supported on Santa Barbara Amorphous 15 (SBA-15) for the production of hydrogen. It was found that the addition of 3%Re to 15%Ni/SBA-15 catalyst significantly improved the glycerol conversion and hydrogen yield due to the small crystallite size and BET surface area, which effectively reduced carbon deposition.
This paper presents the glycerol dry reforming (GDR) reaction using rhenium (Re) promoted on Ni-based catalyst supported on Santa Barbara Amorphous 15 (SBA-15) for the production of hydrogen. In this study, the non-promoted (15%Ni/SBA-15) and promoted (3%Re-15%Ni/SBA-15) catalysts were first synthesized using wet impregnation method and their physicochemical characteristics were analyzed with Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric (TGA) analyses. Their performances were evaluated in GDR reaction and it was found that 3%Re-15%Ni/SBA-15 exhibited higher glycerol conversion (57%) and hydrogen yield (55%) than 15%Ni/SBA-15 (i.e., 20% glycerol conversion and 18% hydrogen yield). From the GDR study, the highest glycerol conversion (57%) and hydrogen yield (55%) for 3%Re-15%Ni/SBA-15 were obtained at 0.2 g catalyst, 700 degrees C of reaction temperature, and CO2 to glycerol ratio (CGR) of 1:1. The small crystallite size and BET surface area of 3%Re-15%Ni/SBA-15 had successfully reduced the carbon deposition and indirectly contributed to high glycerol conversion and product yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据