4.3 Article

Concentrations and modes of occurrence of some potentially valuable and toxic elements in the No. 5 coal from the Yanzishan Mine, Datong Coalfield, Shanxi Province, China

期刊

ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 1694-1720

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0144598719861272

关键词

Trace elements; minerals; modes of occurrence; Yanzishan mine; Datong Coalfield

资金

  1. Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [41330317]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the mineralogical compositions, concentrations and occurrence modes of the elements in the No.5 coal from the Yanzishan Mine were investigated, using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and scanning electron microscopy equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM-EDS). The No. 5 coal is characterized by high ash yield content (mean 32.30%) and low sulfur content (mean 0.47%). The minerals are mainly composed of kaolinite, quartz and pyrite, with a small proportion of illite, apatite, siderite, sphalerite and Ti-oxide. Compared with the Chinese coals, the No. 5 coal has much higher percentages of SiO2 (mean 16.22%) and Al2O3 (mean 14.57%) than other major oxides. Compared with the world hard coals and Chinese coals, the No. 5 coal is enriched in some potentially valuable (Al2O3, Li, Ge, Zr, and Hf) and toxic (Be, As, Se, Cd, and Pb) elements. Lithium and Hf are mainly associated with clay minerals; Be, Se, and Zr mainly have both inorganically and organically affinities; As mainly occurs as a sulfide form in pyrite; Cd is incorporated in clay minerals; and Pb has an affinity for both clay minerals and organic sulfur. All the coal samples are characterized by weakly positive or no pronounced Eu anomalies, indicating that the rare earth elements and yttrium (REY) likewise originated from granite of the Yinshan Oldland together with injection of the low temperature hydrothermal fluids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据