4.7 Article

Characterization of Organic Nitrogen Compounds and Their Impact on the Stability of Marginally Stable Diesel Fuels

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 33, 期 7, 页码 6659-6669

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00932

关键词

-

资金

  1. Defense Logistics Agency Energy (DLA Energy)
  2. Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR)
  3. NRC Research Associateship award at the US Naval Research Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A set of low-sulfur diesel fuels from the Western Pacific region were found to be unstable during storage although they passed all standard specification tests. This sample set was found to have high nitrogen content. Initially, liquid liquid extractions with a mild aqueous acid were performed to separate basic and nonbasic nitrogen groups in an attempt to determine if these organonitrogen classes were responsible for the poor stability. The findings of this study indicate that there may be a correlation between the acid-extractable nitrogen compounds in these fuels and the formation of high levels of particulates in storage. To develop a more comprehensive understanding of the classes and distributions of organonitrogen compounds in fuels, a novel analytical method was developed using two-dimensional gas chromatography with nitrogen chemiluminescence detection (GCxGC-NCD). The GCxGC-NCD analyses revealed the presence of three distinct groups of nitrogen compounds. One group corresponded to the acid-extractable basic nitrogen compounds, one with the nonbasic nitrogen compounds, and a third early-eluting lighter polar organonitrogen fraction that had previously not been observed. This light organonitrogen fraction was unique to these particularly unstable fuels. If this is found to be universally applicable, this light polar nitrogen fraction may serve as an indicator of potentially unstable diesel fuels. Overall, the GCxGC-NCD method has been shown to be a valuable tool to enhance our understanding of the chemistry of organonitrogen species and their impact on fuel stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据