4.7 Article

Energy efficiency evaluation and energy saving based on DEA integrated affinity propagation clustering: Case study of complex petrochemical industries

期刊

ENERGY
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 863-875

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.042

关键词

Data envelopment analysis; Affinity propagation; Energy efficiency evaluation; Energy saving; Complex petrochemical industries

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1601800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61603025, 61533003]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XK1802-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been widely used in the energy efficiency analysis of industrial production processes. However, the traditional DEA model is not high in the division of the efficiency value of decision making units (DMUs), and produces a large number of DMUs with an efficiency value equal to 1, making it difficult to identify their merits and demerits. Therefore, a novel DEA model based on the affinity propagation (AP) clustering algorithm (AP-DEA) is proposed. Through the AP clustering algorithm, high influence input data of the energy efficiency can be obtained. The merits and demerits of DMUs can then be identified with a high degree of discrimination to obtain better efficiency groups. Finally, the proposed model is applied to evaluate the energy efficiency and optimize the energy configuration of the ethylene and pure terephthalic acid (PTA) production processes in complex petrochemical industries. The experimental results show that this proposed model can improve the efficiency value discrimination of efficiency values by effective DMUs better than the traditional DEA. Moreover, the energy saving potentials of ethylene and PTA production systems are approximately 0.49% and 24.74%, respectively, and the carbon emission reduction of the ethylene production system is approximately 10.04%. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据