4.7 Article

Investigation on the temperature sensitivity of the S-CO2 Brayton cycle efficiency

期刊

ENERGY
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 739-750

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.100

关键词

S-CO2; Brayton cycle; Cycle efficiency; Temperature sensitivity

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51706025, 51676020]
  2. Chongqing Natural Science Foundation [cstc2018jszx-cyzdx0100]
  3. Foundation of CNNC key laboratory on nuclear reactor thermohydraulics technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the development of compact heat exchangers in the past few decades, S-CO2 recompression Brayton cycle has attracted much attention. However, the cycle efficiency of the traditional S-CO2 recompression Brayton cycle is sensitive to the compressor inlet temperature, which limits the application of the cycle. According to the property of S-CO2, rapid property change appears in different temperature region under different pressure conditions in pseudocritical area. This feature can be used to reduce recompressing compressor work. To take the advantage of this feature, a modified recompression Brayton cycle based on S-CO2 recompression Brayton cycle is proposed to decrease the temperature sensitivity of recompression Brayton cycle efficiency. Different minimum pressure and different flow split ratio conditions are investigated under various minimum temperature ranges. In this paper, the temperature sensitivity of the cycle efficiency is investigated by an in-house cycle analysis code in the minimum temperature range of 32-50 degrees C and the minimum pressure range of 7.6-9.0 MPa. First and second law of thermodynamics are used to analyze the performance of the two kinds of Brayton cycle. Results show that the modified recompression Brayton cycle has better temperature sensitivity while having comparable cycle efficiency as the recompression Brayton cycle. Moreover, high compressor inlet pressure and small flow split ratio can decrease the temperature sensitivity of cycle efficiency. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据