4.8 Article

Defective ribosomal products challenge nuclear function by impairing nuclear condensate dynamics and immobilizing ubiquitin

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 38, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2018101341

关键词

defective ribosomal products; membraneless organelles; molecular chaperones; nucleus; proteostasis

资金

  1. AriSLA Foundation
  2. Cariplo Foundation [2014-0703]
  3. MAECI (Dissolve_ALS)
  4. MIUR (Departments of excellence 2018-2022) [E91I18001480001]
  5. JPND
  6. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [643417]
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. ERC [725836]
  9. BMBF [01ED1601A, 031A359A]
  10. EMBO Long-Term fellowship [ALTF 406-2017]
  11. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [643417] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [725836] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear protein aggregation has been linked to genome instability and disease. The main source of aggregation-prone proteins in cells is defective ribosomal products (DRiPs), which are generated by translating ribosomes in the cytoplasm. Here, we report that DRiPs rapidly diffuse into the nucleus and accumulate in nucleoli and PML bodies, two membraneless organelles formed by liquid-liquid phase separation. We show that nucleoli and PML bodies act as dynamic overflow compartments that recruit protein quality control factors and store DRiPs for later clearance. Whereas nucleoli serve as constitutive overflow compartments, PML bodies are stress-inducible overflow compartments for DRiPs. If DRiPs are not properly cleared by chaperones and proteasomes due to proteostasis impairment, nucleoli undergo amyloidogenesis and PML bodies solidify. Solid PML bodies immobilize 20S proteasomes and limit the recycling of free ubiquitin. Ubiquitin depletion, in turn, compromises the formation of DNA repair compartments at fragile chromosomal sites, ultimately threatening cell survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据