4.5 Article

Silver Nanoparticles-silsesquioxane Nanomaterial Applied to the Determination of 4-nitrophenol as a Biomarker

期刊

ELECTROANALYSIS
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 2319-2329

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201900217

关键词

hybrid material; silver nanoparticles electrochemical sensor; 4-nitrophenol; quantum chemical calculations; biomarker

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Brazilian government agency Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [446757/2014-4]
  3. National Laboratory of Synchrotron Light (LNLS) [SAXS1-20170380]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel silsesquioxane material was synthetized and used as a stabilizing agent for silver nanoparticles. This hybrid material was characterized by FTIR, Si-29 CP-MAS NMR, C-13 DEPT 135 degrees NMR and TGA techniques and the silver nanoparticles were characterized from DLS, UV-Vis spectroscopy, zeta-potential, TEM and SAXS results. The silver nanoparticles obtained were spherical in shape with a diameter of 3.74 nm. The nanomaterial was successfully applied in the modification of a glassy carbon electrode and a pronounced current response was obtained in the determination of the biomarker 4-nitrophenol. Quantum chemical calculations, using density functional theory, were also performed in order to evaluate the redox properties of the analyte. Two different linear ranges were obtained applying optimal square wave voltammetry conditions. The reduction peak currents obtained were linear for 4-NP concentrations in the ranges of 0.29 to 1.50 mu mol L-1 (E-d=-0.6 V and t(d)=20 s) and 2.75 to 31.5 mu mol L-1, with a theoretical (signal to noise=3) limit of detection of 0.05 mu mol L-1 (t(d)=20 s). The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of 4-NP in synthetic serum samples at different levels of 4-NP with a recovery range of 94-101 %. Validation was performed using a comparative method through the capillary electrophoresis (CE) technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据