4.7 Article

Degradation of tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) in aqueous solution by using pyrite activating persulfate to produce radicals

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 667-674

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.027

关键词

Pyrite-persulfate; Radicals; Tris(2-chloroaniline) phosphate; Product identification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41573091, 41673090, 41771346]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [2015A030306005]
  3. Tip-top Scientific and Technical Innovative Youth Talents of Guangdong Special Support Program [2015TQ01Z233]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organophosphorus esters (OPEs), as one kind of emerging and toxic contaminant are ubiquitous in various environments. This study investigated the degradation of tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) as a category OPEs by pyrite (FeS2)-activated persulfate (PS). The result shows that near-100% degradation of TCEP was achieved after 120 min in FeS2-PS system. The important role of Fe2+ in the activation mechanism was confirmed by the introduction of Fe2+ into the PS only system. Radical scavengers experiment and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) confirmed the presence of SO4 center dot- and center dot OH, which revealed that center dot OH and SO4 center dot- played major roles in TCEP degradation. The effect of various environmental factors, including pyrite and oxidant dosage, inorganic ions and pH were investigated. The result indicated that Fe3+ and Cl can accelerate the degradation rate of TCEP and the reaction between TCEP and FeS2-PS favors acidic conditions (pH > 9). In addition, due to the acidification of pyrite, this system can be applied with a wide pH range. Besides, two oxidation products, C4H9Cl2O4P and C2H6ClO4P were identified, which suggest that hydroxylation was probably the main mechanism. This study greatly improves our understanding on TCEP removal in FeS2-PS system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据