4.7 Article

Fish assemblage convergence along stream environmental gradients: an intercontinental analysis

期刊

ECOGRAPHY
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 1691-1702

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.04690

关键词

environmental filters; fishes; intercontinental; microhabitat; streams

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species that pass through similar environmental filters, regardless of geographic proximity or evolutionary history, are expected to share many traits, resulting in similar assemblage trait distributions. Convergence of assemblage trait distributions among different biotic regions would indicate that consistent ecological processes produce repeated patterns of adaptive evolution. This study analyzes trait-environment relationships across multiple stream fish assemblages representing evolutionarily divergent faunas. We hypothesized that trait-environment patterns converge across regional faunas in response to a common set of environmental filters acting on functional traits. One hundred and ninety-seven species and forty streams were sampled from five regions: Belize, Benin, Brazil, Cambodia and USA. By examining trait-environment plots, multiple congruent trait-environment patterns were found across all regions, indicative of a consistent set of environmental filters acting on local community assembly. The consistency of these patterns strongly suggests that water velocity and habitat structural complexity function as universal environmental filters, producing similar assemblage trait distributions in streams across all regions. Bivariate relationships were not universal, and only one of the associations between a single functional trait and single environmental variable was statistically significant across all five regions. Strong phylogenetic signal was found in traits and habitat use, which implies that niche conservatism also influenced assemblage trait distributions. Overall, results support the idea that habitat templates structure trait distributions of stream fish assemblages and do so in a consistent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据