4.7 Article

Start-up and bacterial community compositions of partial nitrification in moving bed biofilm reactor

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 101, 期 6, 页码 2563-2574

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-8003-9

关键词

Bacterial community; High-throughput pyrosequencing; Modified carriers; Moving bed biofilm reactor; Partial nitrification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408095]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M561236, 2015T80257]
  3. Foundation of Liaoning Educational Committee [L2014021]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT16RC(4)13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Partial nitrification (PN) has been considered as one of the promising processes for pretreatment of ammonium-rich wastewater. In this study, a kind of novel carriers with enhanced hydrophilicity and electrophilicity was implemented in a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) to start up PN process. Results indicated that biofilm formation rate was higher on modified carriers. In comparison with the reactor filled with traditional carriers (start-up period of 21 days), it took only 14 days to start up PN successfully with ammonia removal efficiency and nitrite accumulation rate of 90 and 91%, respectively, in the reactor filled with modified carriers. Evident changes of spatial distributions and community structures had been detected during the start-up. Free-floating cells existed in planktonic sludge, while these microorganisms trended to form flocs in the biofilm. High-throughput pyrosequencing results indicated that Nitrosomonas was the predominant ammonia-oxidizing bacterium (AOB) in the PN system, while Comamonas might also play a vital role for nitrogen oxidation. Additionally, some other bacteria such as Ferruginibacter, Ottowia, Saprospiraceae, and Rhizobacter were selected to establish stable footholds. This study would be potentially significant for better understanding the microbial features and developing efficient strategies accordingly for MBBR-based PN operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据