4.5 Article

Modeling the biomechanics of fetal movements

期刊

BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 995-1004

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-015-0738-1

关键词

Musculoskeletal development; Joint biomechanics; Cine MRI; Developmental dysplasia of the hip; Computational model

资金

  1. Arthritis Research UK [20683]
  2. MRC [MR/K006355/1, MC_U120088465] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/K006355/1, MC_U120088465] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Versus Arthritis [20683] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fetal movements in the uterus are a natural part of development and are known to play an important role in normal musculoskeletal development. However, very little is known about the biomechanical stimuli that arise during movements in utero, despite these stimuli being crucial to normal bone and joint formation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to create a series of computational steps by which the forces generated during a kick in utero could be predicted from clinically observed fetal movements using novel cine-MRI data of three fetuses, aged 20-22 weeks. A custom tracking software was designed to characterize the movements of joints in utero, and average uterus deflection of mm due to kicking was calculated. These observed displacements provided boundary conditions for a finite element model of the uterine environment, predicting an average reaction force of N generated by a kick against the uterine wall. Finally, these data were applied as inputs for a musculoskeletal model of a fetal kick, resulting in predicted maximum forces in the muscles surrounding the hip joint of approximately 8 N, while higher maximum forces of approximately 21 N were predicted for the muscles surrounding the knee joint. This study provides a novel insight into the closed mechanical environment of the uterus, with an innovative method allowing elucidation of the biomechanical interaction of the developing fetus with its surroundings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据